Abstract

As organizations have begun to adopt battening cloud computing technology, business needs have indicated the actual integration of edge computing into enterprise cloud, offering real-time data processing at low latency conditions. An edge computing system is performance-based, bringing such application processing nearer to the data source, thus bringing minimum reliance on central cloud infrastructure. This document studies distributed intelligence architectural pattern premises from approaches for effective deployment, security considerations, and optimization in performance.

Key architectural patterns include cloud-edge hybrid models that merge centralized cloud computing with edge processing in dissemination to improve efficiency and resilience. Also, microservices-based architectures provide modular, scalable, and flexible deployments where enterprises can optimize the allocation of resources and adaptation of systems. AI for edge intelligence further augments real-time analytics through machine learning models at the edge, thus removing stringent and constant cloud connectivity and possible real-time analytics.

Security is a further element necessitated by integrating edges into enterprise cloud systems. Other challenges like data encryption, secure communication, and access control should not be left unmonitored as they all have something to do with penetration strength toward safeguarding these systems from possible cyber attacks. Performance optimization strategies such as workload sharing, minimization of network latencies, and intelligent caching mechanisms define the entire system's efficiency in maintaining its efficiencies.

The paper highlights the design considerations for scalable, secure, and high-performance cloud-edge ecosystems through these different architectural patterns. Understanding these strategies leads enterprises to be best positioned to reap the benefits that edge computing offers without losing the flexibility and scalability characteristics of cloud services to the greater spectrum they set toward real-time data processing within the modern demands of business environments

Keywords

  • Agile
  • software engineering
  • code quality
  • continuous integration
  • deployment frequency
  • SEM
  • organisational culture
  • adaptability.

References

  1. 1. Gartner. (2015). Gartner says 6.4 billion connected ‘things’ will be in use in 2016, up 30 percent from 2015. Retrieved from http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3165317.
  2. 2. McKinsey. (2015). By 2025, Internet of Things applications could have $11 trillion impact. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/overview/in-the-news/by-2025-internet-of-thingsapplications-could-have-11-trillion-impact.
  3. 3. Cassar, K. (2016, April). Amazon Echo: Seattle’s sonic boom is felt beyond e-commerce. Slice Intelligence, Inc. Retrieved from http://intelligence.slice.com/.
  4. 4. Nest. (2015, April). Nest Learning Thermostat efficiency simulation: Update using data from first three months. Palo Alto, CA, USA.
  5. 5. Michaels, M. M. (2015, November). The Apple Watch case study: What we can learn and apply from an affordance analysis. Fairfield, LA, USA.
  6. 6. Itron. (2014). OpenWay Riva adaptive communications technology. Liberty Lake, WA, USA. Retrieved from https://www.itron.com/.
  7. 7. Nunes, B. A. A., Mendonca, M., Nguyen, X.-N., Obraczka, K., & Turletti, T. (2014). A survey of software-defined networking: Past, present, and future of programmable networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(3), 1617-1634.
  8. 8. Wang, S., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., Yang, J., & Wang, W. (2017). A survey on mobile edge networks: Convergence of computing, caching, and communications. IEEE Access, 5, 6757-6779.
  9. 9. Liu, H., Eldarrat, F., Alqahtani, H., Reznik, A., de Foy, X., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Mobile edge cloud system: Architectures, challenges, and approaches. IEEE Systems Journal. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7843586/.
  10. 10. Mach, P., & Becvar, Z. (2017). Mobile edge computing: A survey on architecture and computation offloading. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(3), 1628-1656.
  11. 11. Taleb, T., Samdanis, K., Mada, B., Flinck, H., Dutta, S., & Sabella, D. (2017). On multi-access edge computing: A survey of the emerging 5G network edge cloud architecture and orchestration. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(3), 1657-1681.
  12. 12. Al-Shuwaili, A., & Simeone, O. (2017). Energy-efficient resource allocation for mobile edge computing-based augmented reality applications. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 6(3), 398-401.
  13. 13. Amjad, A., Rabby, F., Sadia, S., Patwary, M., & Benkhelifa, E. (2017, May). Cognitive edge computing-based resource allocation framework for Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Fog and Mobile Edge Computing (FMEC) (pp. 194-200).
  14. 14. Beraldi, R., Mtibaa, A., & Alnuweiri, H. (2017, May). Cooperative load balancing scheme for edge computing resources. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Fog and Mobile Edge Computing (FMEC) (pp. 94-100).
  15. 15. Al-Badarneh, J., Jararweh, Y., Al-Ayyoub, M., Al-Smadi, M., & Fontes, R. (2017, May). Software-defined storage for cooperative mobile edge computing systems. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Software-Defined Systems (SDS) (pp. 174-179).
  16. 16. Chen, X., Jiao, L., Li, W., & Fu, X. (2016). Efficient multi-user computation offloading for mobile-edge cloud computing. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 24(5), 2795-2808.
  17. 17. Dama, S., Sathya, V., Kuchi, K., & Pasca, T. V. (2017). A feasible cellular Internet of Things: Enabling edge computing and the IoT in dense futuristic cellular networks. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 6(1), 66-72.
  18. 18. Kumar, N., Zeadally, S., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2016). Vehicular delay-tolerant networks for smart grid data management using mobile edge computing. IEEE Communications Magazine, 54(10), 6-60.